Unleashing the power of Separation – Transformative opportunities for value maximisation!

Authored By -  Samir Sheth
In the contemporary dynamic business environment, organisations are constantly exploring ways to maximise value and gain a competitive edge, and one strategic approach that has gained acceptance is the concept of separation. This move holds the potential to unlock substantial opportunities for growth and development. By recognising and capitalising on the unique strengths and attributes of the entities involved, organisations can tap the potential that might have been hindered within the larger structure.  
Align on the End Goals for Carve-out
Companies can bring out unique opportunities to unlock potential through separation. Organisations can focus on their core strengths and prioritise areas of growth by streamlining various business units and functions. By divesting their non-core, underperforming assets or performing businesses which may not be completely complementary to each other, organisations can increase operational efficiency and improve resource allocation. Alternately, by focusing on high-potential business segments, they can distribute resources more effectively, drive innovation, and position themselves for sustainable growth.

Simultaneously, the separated entity can seek new market opportunities, form strategic partnerships, and chart its course for success. This dual approach positions both entities on a sustained growth trajectory and maximises value creation for all stakeholders.
Analyse Separation Costs
Executives planning a divestiture should be cautious of separation costs, as the process of carving out a business from the parent company is complex and often expensive. Unexpected one-time and ongoing expenses can arise from transitional services, loss of scale, and inefficient post-divestment structures.

Carve-out costs may include transaction costs (banking and underwriting fees, legal expenses, etc.), legal and regulatory costs, IT expenses, severance costs, payroll costs, marketing expenses, office and facilities costs, and tax structuring issues. Effective support cost analysis during separation involves identifying areas of redundancy, streamlining processes, and optimising resource allocation. By doing so, companies can reduce operational costs and redirect resources to growth-oriented initiatives. This step ensures that separation does not lead to unnecessary financial burden and supports long-term value maximisation.
 

Cost Category

Description

One-Time Costs

Incurred to separate operations and assets during restructuring. Some examples of one-time costs include:

  • Office and facilities relocation

  • Severance payments

  • Set-up of manufacturing and distribution network

  • IT systems set-up

Transitional Services

Costs related to Transitional Service Agreements (TSAs) to ensure continuity of operations for the divested business. Setting up TSAs can incur high one-time costs to the parent organisation. TSAs are typically executed for the below functions:

  • Finance shared services

  • IT shared services

  • Manufacturing facilities

  • Shared key employees

Dis-synergies

Costs resulting from decreased economies of scale, leading to higher unit costs after carving out a business. These may occur in administrative and IT services, causing potential loss of cross-selling opportunities.

  • Direct procurement dis-synergies

  • Revenue dis-synergies due to reduced cross-selling opportunities

  • Reduced manufacturing capacity utilisation

Stranded Costs

Stranded costs in carve-out refer to costs left on the table for the remaining entity during a carve-out. These costs are linked to the operations of the divested business and cannot easily be eliminated after the carve-out. Stranded costs may arise due to lower purchasing power, fewer economies of scale, or redundant people, processes, and platforms.
Parent companies should initiate the identification of stranded costs at an early stage. Addressing these costs can be time-consuming due to their hidden nature, and their elimination often necessitates substantial change management efforts.

Proactive Talent Management

Talent is a critical asset for any organisation, and proactive talent management is essential during times of transformation. Companies must provide clear career paths and offer special packages to retain key employees. Proactive talent management ensures a smooth transition during separation, mitigates the risk of losing critical expertise, and fosters a positive organisational culture.

For the separated entity (CarveCo) as well as the remaining company (RemainCo), a customised talent management strategy is a significant factor for success in a carve-out transaction. The former must identify and retain key talent that is in tune with strategic objectives to preserve institutional knowledge and promote innovation. The latter should determine the effect of the separation on its workforce, address talent gaps, and invest in employee development to ensure a smooth transition and continued success in its core operations. Through effective talent management, the two entities can unlock potential, drive growth, and achieve their objectives in the post-separation landscape.

In conclusion, carve-outs provide significant opportunities to transform the operations at both RemainCo and CarveCo. Close evaluation and monitoring of costs involved are essential to determine the right strategy for separation and help buyers with integration services.